Canadian Underground Infrastructure Logo

Cost-effective site sampling tools for environmental assessments

GPR and EM technologies offer advantages over expensive and time-consuming drilling

Cost-effective site sampling tools for environmental assessments

Company info

12 Industrial Way
Salem, NH
US, 03079

Website:
geophysical.com

Phone number:
603-893-1109

Read more

Geophysical surveys can be the bedrock (pardon the pun) of today’s environmental projects, from locating abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) and utilities, to complex mapping of geology in remedial investigations, to finding landfill boundaries and other buried unknown problems. In the past few decades, a variety of non-destructive testing methods have gained in popularity over expensive and time-consuming drilling and digging for environmental projects. Among these, the method of pairing ground penetrating radar (GPR) with electromagnetic (EM) induction instruments is one that shows great promise in significantly reducing survey time and costs.

Geophysical toolbox

In the past, most environmental scientists and geologists relied on destructive technologies, including drilling and excavating test pits. Depending on the site (and project budget), a survey may require drilling or digging one or two holes for a small site, or as many as 20 to 30+ holes for large sites. On average, each borehole into the ground on an environmental site costs about $5,000 to $10,000, so costs for drilling or soil sampling can be very high. And not only are these methods slow and costly, they merely produce point measurements, rather than a continuous profile.

In response to the expense and safety of destructive surveys, and concern about the accuracy of relying on point measurements, companies have more recently come to rely on a variety of other nondestructive survey methods.

Chief among these is ground penetrating radar (GPR), which works by sending a tiny pulse of energy into a material via an antenna. A computer records the strength and time required for the return of any reflected signals. Subsurface variations will create reflections that are picked up by the system and stored on digital media. These reflections are produced by a variety of materials, including geological structure differences and man-made objects like pipes and foundations. GPR is considered the most accurate, highest resolution geophysical technology.

In general, GPR works best in dry sandy soils with little salt content, but dense clay-based soils are difficult to penetrate with GPR. In some situations, penetration depth may be limited to a few feet or less within clays, whereas targets residing in sandy soils could be detected at depths of 30 feet or more. The photo on page 19 shows a GPR unit surveying the location of buried tanks at a gas station and looking for other underground obstructions.

A GPR survey can be done at a cost of $1,000 to $2,000 per day, which means one can cover an entire site with GPR for less than the cost of a single borehole. In light of these clear cost advantages, GPR is now often the preferred method on environmental and construction sites. Instead of boring three to four holes, companies can bore one hole, then use GPR to match the results and correlate data across the remainder of the site.

Another tool for the measurement of subsurface conditions is use of the seismic refraction method, which requires a seismic energy source, trigger cable (or radio link), geophones, geophone cable, and a seismograph. Seismic equipment is useful for finding larger features such as soil layers and bedrock depths, especially when deeper information is required. It works well in clay soils, where GPR is not effective, but it is quite time consuming. To set up and collect the data and then analyze it, you may only collect two to four single transects per day, which gives you vertical cross sections into the ground at those locations. By comparison, with GPR one could collect data using 1.5-metre spacing in two directions and cover two hectares per day in the same amount of time.

Along with seismic refraction, a different tool widely used for mapping the depth of soils and rock is electrical resistivity imaging (ERI), which involves placing stakes in the ground and measuring electrical resistance. This tool also works well in clay soil. However, similar to seismic equipment, it takes longer and costs more to get the required data coverage. Technicians must set up a row of about 24 to 48 sensors (metal stakes) along the ground typically in a straight line. The line can be as long as required, but you are only getting the information along that one line. One can collect 80 or more profiles of similar length with GPR in the same time it takes to collect three to four profiles using this technique.

Magnetometers measure the strength and sometimes the direction of a magnetic field. By detecting irregularities in the earth’s magnetic field, a magnetometer can indicate the location of old tanks and drums, but only those that are made of ferrous material; they won’t locate plastic or concrete utility pipes or fibreglass tanks. Some types of magnetometers, also known as pipe and cable locators, feature a transmitting wand that is waved back and forth over the ground’s surface looking for a signal. It does a good job of finding ferrous objects but does not provided accurate depth information like GPR.

Also useful as a reconnaissance technique is the use of electromagnetic induction (EM or EMI) devices, which are based on the measurement of the change in mutual impedance between a pair of coils on or above the earth’s surface. Most EM instruments are comprised of two or more sets of coils. These coils are electrically connected and are separated by a fixed distance. EM devices can simultaneously examine soil conditions and locate objects found beneath the surface of the earth spatially, but do not provide good depth information.

One of EM’s limitations is that it cannot be used in close proximity (1.5 to six metres), depending on manufacturer) to aboveground obstructions like buildings, cars, and fences. This makes it less useful for smaller urban sites like gas stations, where there tend to be numerous aboveground obstructions.

GPR gaining in popularity for geophysical surveys

Among all these options, GPR equipment has become considerably more popular in the last 10 years for environmental projects. It is commonly used for locating old USTs, oil tanks, and gas tanks, as well as 189-litre waste drums filled with chemicals that were routinely dumped on sites in the 1970s and 80s. It is also an important tool for mapping utility and product lines, old landfill boundaries, debris pits, buried environmental targets, or waste. Finally, GPR is used in remediation investigations to map soil layers and depth to top of water table or bedrock. Contaminants mainly pool either on top of the water table or bedrock, so environmental scientists need to map changes in these features to plan their borings.

The upsurge in GPR’s popularity is largely driven by cost and safety – it is far cheaper, and much safer, to do a quick geophysical survey than drill numerous holes in the ground at a significantly higher cost. Cost has come down relative to other technologies, and it is easier to use. Older GPR units required a trained geophysicist to operate – with today’s equipment, users can virtually push a button and start scanning.

GPR + EM = savings

On some sites, there is a definite cost advantage to combining use of EM with GPR. On smaller projects, like locating tanks at gas stations, GPR and/or pipe and cable locators can easily get the job done alone. But for larger multi-acre projects, such as multiple areas at old factory sites or large governmental cleanup sites, there can be huge cost savings by using EM first and then focusing the GPR only on “hot spots” or anomalous areas located using the EM.

There are three main reasons EM is a good first tool on large sites: you can collect data much faster; the device does not have to be in contact with the ground (or as close to it) as does GPR; and the EM device’s scanning swath is slightly wider.

Because the EM is carried, rather than pushed or dragged like a GPR device, users can walk faster and maneuver around obstacles more quickly. It is far easier to collect data with the carried EM on sites where there may be overgrown grass, tall weeds, or rocks. Also, an EM can very easily be adapted to be pulled behind an ATV with a trailer or sled setup – again making data collection faster. Most EM systems also have either built-in or plug-in global positioning systems (GPS), so one does not have to waste time setting up a physical grid (measuring, spray paint, pin flags, and the like).

After using an EM device as the first, fast survey, the user quickly plots that data (this can be done in the field on a laptop in about 10 minutes) and looks for anomalies, targets, and/or potential soil issues. EM cannot provide exact information on the target’s depth, shape, and orientation but the data is easy to view, process, and even immediately overlay on maps such as Google Earth. GPR surveying is narrowed to only those target areas found with the EM, and the GPR is used to provide information on depths, size (dimensions/shapes), and orientation of targets in either 2D or 3D imaging.

This combo EM/GPR surveying method saves a lot of time and money on environmental and construction sites when looking for old USTs, illegally disposed of or buried 189-litre drums, old foundations, possible debris pits or former landfills, other various types of targets, and even some contaminant plumes.

Dealing with constantly varying soil or aboveground conditions from site to site is another reason why it pays to have both types of equipment in the company “tool bag.” For example, EM works much better (images deeper) in clay soils than the GPR, and GPR works much better (images deeper) in sandy soils than the EM. Also, as noted, an EM system cannot be used within about 1.5 metres of cars, buildings, and fences, whereas the GPR has no issue with these features. Having both available would provide more site coverage.

Users often bring both tools to an unknown site; if the soils are overly clayey they can mainly use EM, and if the soils are very sandy they mainly use GPR. If conditions lay somewhere in the middle they may want to use both tools. In this way, they are gathering multiple data sets and optimizing their potential results for their clients, along with reducing liability and improving confidence that they are locating everything on site. Finding an anomaly or target in both EM and GPR would be considered the equivalent of a geophysicist’s homerun.

Lastly, each tool may be better at locating a specific target type – GPR can find both metallic and non-metallic objects, whereas EM is mainly good at finding metallic objects. EM is good at mapping soil changes (either geologic or disturbances such as UST graves), mud pits, and potential contaminant plumes, whereas it is tougher to identify those items with GPR. In some instances GPR can have difficulties with corrugated metal drain pipes because of the design and the way the GPR energy is scattered, whereas EM works well finding such large metal targets. Therefore, using both tools together offers a higher likelihood of success in finding everything the client is looking for (or not looking for).

The cost benefit of pairing the two tools is based on the simple fact that EM is five times faster than GPR on the front end, which lets users focus use of GPR only on identified hot spots. Let’s look at this calculation using a two-hectare site. GPR takes about a day to do 0.4 hectare well, so it would take five days to complete the entire survey. EM can complete about two hectares in one day. Starting with EM would therefore allow completion of an initial survey in one day, leaving the second day for use of GPR. This cuts the project from five days to two.

The resulting savings can range from 30 to 60 percent, depending upon the site. Since GPR/EM consulting fees are typically in the $200 to $400 per hour range, the three-day savings could be on the order of $5,000 to $10,000. From the consulting perspective, one might think – “Why would I want to shave all that profit from my jobs?” The answer is that by doing this, one can build better relationships with clients; allow more time for other projects or office work (what small company ever has enough time to get all their office work done?); and get your name and services in front of more clients to grow the business.

In addition, GPR and EM integrate well with GPS systems, which have exploded in popularity in the past decade. The ability to map out and locate targets with GPS coordinates paired with the GPR/EM results and overlying them on Google Earth, geographic information systems (GIS), and AutoCAD is a huge advantage. The ability to streamline reports and simplify the final product for client interpretation is crucial to success in this day and age, especially given ever-increasing client expectations and decreased patience for waiting for reports.

Overall, using these technologies and adding to business capabilities instantly differentiates one from competitors, expands service offerings in a wide range of applications (construction, environmental, geotechnical, engineering, forensics, and more), and offers the potential to significantly increase revenue for only a small investment.
Technicians using GSSI’s Profiler EMP-400 frequency domain, EM profiling system. The Profiler, which can get within 1.5 metres of aboveground obstructions, can be used to both locate metallic targets and also measure soil conductivity – even at tighter urban sites.

More from Locating, Inspection

Pole camera from CUES lightweight, portable and wireless

CUES has developed a new lightweight, portable, wireless digital video inspection pole camera that can be operated by one person. The new QuickZoom III (QZIII) camera is designed to provide cable-free safe-viewing in industrial or environmental areas with no man entry. Perform swift inspections and surveys of pipelines, wet wells, manholes, sewer treatment plants, steam generators, tanks, vessels, and other areas that are difficult to reach. QZIII can also be used to locate lateral services or to identify blockages at manholes, access ports, or other entry points without entering the line or structure.

CUES launches new pipeline inspection tool

CUES has developed a new pipeline inspection tool designed to significantly reduce unplanned downtime. The CUES REDI (Remote Evaluation Diagnostic Inspection) Kit is the first pipeline inspection troubleshooting kit available on the market today designed to help diagnose electrical issues, allowing for quicker and more accurate troubleshooting and repairs of problems while in the field. The release of this new product reflects CUES continuing commitment to offer the best customer support services in the business.

Cansel acquires Trenchless Utility Equipment precision locating business

Cansel, a software, hardware, and service provider to engineering, surveying, construction, architecture, government and printing industries announced today that it has acquired the precision location business of Trenchless Utility Equipment Inc. in Ontario and Alberta.  First established in 1992, Trenchless Utility Equipment Inc. was formed to specialize in the relatively new Horizontal Directional Drill Industry. Over the years the company has become a leader in protecting underground utility infrastructure. 

Robust, cost-effective downhole inspection camera from Hoskin

The dipper-See EXAMINER from Hoskin Scientific is a robust and cost effective vertical downhole inspection camera. Designed with portability in mind, this self-contained unit is ideal for viewing in wells, drains, vertical shafts, open bodies of water, boreholes and narrow tubes over 25mm (1") in diameter.

  • Versatile positioning arm
  • High Definition (HD) display screen
  • HD, detachable See-120 camera probe
  • Recordable video/audio
  • Designed to work in the harshest environments
  • Built in hanger - hands-free viewing while in the field

Latest in ground penetrating radar on display at World of Concrete

GSSI, the world's leading manufacturer of ground penetrating radar (GPR) equipment, will be highlighting its latest GPR technology at the 2018 World of Concrete conference, to be held January 23-26, 2018, at the Las Vegas Convention Center in Las Vegas, Nevada, Booth #C3719. On display will be a new affordable UtilityScan GPR System, StructureScan Mini XT all-in-one concrete inspection GPR system, and the new Palm XT miniaturized GPR antenna for the StructureScan Mini XT. 

New Sentinel Portable Inspection System

The new Sentinel Inspection System, from Aries Industries, Inc., is an integrated system with all components operated by an all-in-one controller. The compact, portable unit combines a lightweight reel, a quick set-up tractor and a state-of-the-art camera.

Subsite Electronics acquires R.S. Technical Services

Subsite Electronics, a Charles Machine Works Company, has announced the acquisition of the assets of R.S. Technical Services, Inc. (RST), an innovator in the design and manufacture of closed-circuit television remote inspection and monitoring cameras. The deal adds proven camera inspection capabilities to Subsite's robust line of Underground Awareness solutions.

free-paper-airplane

Get our newsletter

Learn more

multiVIEW opens Kitchener office to expand service coverage across Southern Ontario

multiVIEW Locates Inc. a professional services firm that specializes in locating and mapping buried infrastructure has announced the opening of its’ fourth office location in Kitchener, Ontario.  The new location will allow multiVIEW to quickly deploy to deliver private and public utility locating services across the city and surrounding area, bridging the gap between the company’s existing Mississauga and London-based offices.

The Smarter Way to Locate

The Vermeer Verifier™ G3 utility locator by McLaughlin combines trusted precision with a user-friendly interface. Contractors face congested underground conditions, unmarked utilities and increasingly strict regulations, making accurate, timely locating more important than ever.  The Verifier G3 features include a combination peak and null screen, semiautomatic and manual gain adjustment, and automatic depth and current measurement index. The new compass icon simplifies the locating process by automatically calculating the peak signal and informing the user of the direction of the utility path. With the Verifier G3, users can expect the same core qualities of the Verifier G2 including: a durable design with antennas mounted in rubber isolators to standup to the toughest jobsite conditions and the exclusive McLaughlin three-year warranty and weather-proof guarantee. Users new to the locating profession will appreciate the streamlined design and simple interface; advanced operators have the option to capitalize on some of the industry’s most advanced locating technology — all in one device.  

GSSI announces flexible, configurable ground penetrating radar system for utility detection

GSSI, a leading manufacturer of ground penetrating radar (GPR) equipment, announces the release of the UtilityScan Pro, the latest addition to the company’s popular UtilityScan GPR product line. UtilityScan systems are the industry standard for efficiently identifying and marking the location and depth of subsurface utilities, including gas, sewer, and communication lines. Featuring the SIR 4000 control unit, the UtilityScan Pro delivers the configurability and flexibility to address a wide range of utility applications.

multiVIEW opens new office location to meet growing demand across Southwestern Ontario

multiVIEW, a leading professional services firm that specializes in locating and mapping buried infrastructure is pleased to announce the opening of its London, Ontario office. The strategically situated office location will allow multiVIEW to complete local contract-based work and quickly deploy to meet growing demand across Southwestern Ontario for utility locating, hydro-excavation and CCTV camera inspection services.

New guidelines for utility relocations

Utility relocations typically present one of the largest potential risks to delivering major capital infrastructure projects on time or on budget within urbanized areas. Until now there has been little in terms of a standardized process in place regarding the coordination of the utility impacts and the management of the effects of the utility relocations on a project.

Cross bore problem in the crosshairs

They are two words no contractor or municipal engineer wants to hear: cross bore. A cross bore is what happens when one underground utility intersects another. Most worrying is when a gas line punches through a sewer main or lateral. Cross bore risk has risen with the use of trenchless technologies like horizontal directional drilling, because the operator can’t physically see what’s in the immediate vicinity of the drill bit.

Subsite Electronics introduces TK RECON Series HDD Guidance System

Subsite Electronics, a Charles Machine Works Company, introduces the TK RECON Series HDD Guidance System. The TK RECON Series offers all the proven benefits of the original TK Series built on a new, advanced-technology base that allows the company to incorporate several performance-enhancing features now, and accept upgraded features in the future.

free-magazine-subscription

Get Our Magazine

Paper or Digital delivered monthly to you

Subscribe or Renew Learn more

Montreal-based consultancy completes inspection and leak detection of six 1,200-mm steel watermains and one 1,500-mm PCCP main in Montreal

Since September 2013, GAME Consultants has been paving the way for the next generation of watermain condition assessment tools by using existing tools and working to improve the results with every project. The company’s position is to equip itself with a wide range of tools designed exclusively for use in watermains.

Using technology for a higher purpose

The technologies for inspecting sewer, storm water and watermain pipes are well established and get deployed with confidence by municipalities across Canada when it comes to pipeline rehabilitation or replacement work.

GSSI’s new 350 HS Antenna uses HyperStacking technology to improve performance while meeting GPR emissions limits

GSSI has announced its 350 HS Antenna, which greatly improves the depth and data resolution performance of traditional real time sampling technologies. The 350 HS is designed for use with new digital HyperStacking technology, which allows users to see deeper targets and operate in conditions considered too “noisy” for conventional systems. Easily configurable, the 350 HS antenna is ideal for archaeology, geophysics, and utility locating applications.

Trimble launches new version of its smart water management software to streamline utility field operations

Trimble has announced the latest version of its smart water mapping and work management software—Trimble Unity 3.0. Trimble Unity is a cloud-based, (GIS) centric software-as-a-service (SaaS) solution for smart water management. Version 3.0 includes new features and workflows and also offers an App Builder and new integration capabilities to simplify connecting mobile workers with maps and data from back office enterprise systems.

Prevent leaks and bring lead leaching into compliance with ePIPE

Pipe Restoration Inc., Technologies, LLC, (PRT), a world-leading pipe lining innovator and manufacturer of the patented, proven ePIPE pipe restoration technology, offers the fastest, 2 hour return to service barrier coating that prevents water pipe leaks, as well as bringing lead leaching into compliance. In honor of the United States' Environmental Protection Agency's national Fix a Leak Week, and United Nations' World Water Day on March 22, PRT announces that it is helping to combat the global issue of water conservation and access to clean water with the ePIPE patented leak protection process.

“Locatable Rope” from 3M

The Electronic Marker System (EMS) Rope 7700 series uses propriety 3M path marking technology to deliver more accurate and more reliable tracking of underground plastic pipe and fiber optic conduit. Designed as a high performance alternative to the current industry standard solution, the new EMS Rope series is available for use in the electrical utility industry. The EMS Rope Series is also available for gas, telco, wastewater and water utility applications.

free-paper-airplane

Get our newsletter

Learn more

Into the void

It’s not uncommon to use ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to map underground utilities, but some municipalities are using it to find, well, nothing at all.

Lead pipes still a problem in Canada

The shocking story of lead contamination in Flint, Michigan may seem like a one-off situation that most of us living in modern housing don’t need to worry about. But after reading with horror and sadness all the coverage of how officials in Flint failed to protect thousands of mostly poor Americans, including children, from ingesting dangerous levels of lead that leached from corroded water pipes, I decided to look at the situation north of the border. (Flint is only a two-hour drive from London, ON) The conclusion? While the lead pipe problem in Canada isn’t as dire as in Flint, admittedly an extreme example, neither should we turn a blind eye to it, because thousands of Canadians (the exact number is impossible to pinpoint) may also be unknowingly drinking lead-contaminated water because they live in older homes where lead pipes and fittings were commonly installed.

B.C. robotics manufacturer working with Seatronics to supply ROV

Seatronics, an Acteon company, and market leaders in the rental and sale of marine electronic equipment, has announced a collaboration with Canadian-based manufacturer, Inuktun Services Ltd. Inuktun has extensive expertise in remote controlled robotic transport and delivery of multi-mission, modular technology used in hazardous environments and confined spaces.

Addressing the challenges of inspecting corrugated metal pipe

Corrugated metal pipe (CMP) is heavily reliant on supporting soil for structural integrity. As such, a condition assessment must include an evaluation of the supporting soil to be considered complete. Previously there was no conclusive and quantifiable way to assess soil condition without damaging the pipe wall – further compromising the structural condition of the pipe.

Inspection Crawler System

For pipe diameters 6 to 12 inches using the inline version or 12 inches and greater for the parallel chassis, the Versatrax 150 Mark II is capable of penetrating as far as one kilometre in a single deployment, more than 540 metres further than the standard Versatrax 150 pipe inspection vehicle.

Robotic inspection goes 1/2-K deep

In June, ASI Marine (ASI) personnel conducted a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) underwater inspection of the Cheves Hydropower Tunnel in Peru and ended up breaking the ASI company record for the deepest flooded tunnel inspection at 570 metres water depth. The Cheves Hydropower Project is being developed by Empresa de Generacion Electrica Cheves S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Statkraft, a Norwegian electricity company.

free-magazine-subscription

Get Our Magazine

Paper or Digital delivered monthly to you

Subscribe or Renew Learn more